Partners
HOME    BLOGS    BLOGGERS    MESSAGES    VIDEO    AUDIO    REPORTS    RESEARCH    WEBINARS

US Cities Pose Risk to Pedestrians

Future Cities
Wednesday, October 9, 2013 14:00 EDT

19 comments
Newest First    Oldest First    Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
kq4ym
kq4ym  
9/15/2014 9:26:37 AM
User Rank Urban Legend
Re: Infographic
I would suspect older adults and very young children may be at the highest risk. The older folks has poorer hearing and sight, and those factors among others would surely add to the numbers of accidents. Maybe there should be a better educational effort to targtet drivers with being more aware of pedestrians?

kq4ym
kq4ym  
4/30/2014 10:46:14 AM
User Rank Urban Legend
Re: Infographic
It appears the most dangerous situation is at night at a non-intersection with a male attempting to cross the street. Seems pretty straight forward but how do we get those men to just use intersections, and drivers to pay more attention while driving at night?

Amy Rogers Nazarov
Amy Rogers Nazarov  
2/27/2014 9:57:12 AM
User Rank Urban Legend
Re: Odd Stats
What a dreadful story about the biker killing the walker.

Just two days ago in Arlington, a mom loading her 2-year-old into her car seat was killed by a dump truck that crashed into her car and her right in front of her 5-year-old's elementary school. Horrifying, heart-breaking stuff

I guess Arlington would fall into the Urban category. It's neither purely rural nor purely urban. But it does have narrow streets - at least this one was. The police are trying to ascertain how fast the dump truck was going. The woman's husband and children are trying to put one foot in front of the other. 

Venks
Venks  
1/29/2014 12:46:24 AM
User Rank Urban Legend
Re: Odd Stats
@mejjac: I agree with NewDream and would like to have much more information regarding these fatalities because it is such an important and critical discussion and coming to any conclusion based on less info will not bring any justice to this discussion.

Venks
Venks  
1/29/2014 12:35:27 AM
User Rank Urban Legend
Fatalities today
Frankly, its not a surprise for me to see such accidents these days due to the fact that pedesterains and drivers both do NOT follow the traffic rules as seriously now than they used to do it earlier. With more and more usage of technology for its safety humans are getting dumber and dumber (or even read as lazier)!

sunshine
sunshine  
12/20/2013 4:37:56 PM
User Rank Urban Legend
Re: Odd Stats
Yes NewDream, odd stats indeed. As you say 'not to mention motorists' .... they don't.  Factors involved in pedestrian deaths makes no mention of them. Surely there must have been a lot of motorists involved in the pedestrians deaths?  

NewDream
NewDream  
11/12/2013 10:59:09 AM
User Rank Urban Legend
Re: Odd Stats
Sparker, I was surprised to hear of cyclists killing pedestrians. Looked it up, found that it does happen, but not often.

The case you cited (I only found one, not two) is a very San Francisco sort of accident, since the cyclist that was using the incredible 'boost' from the hills in order to gain an uncontrollable speed. Further, the victim's family felt that incarceration was not a suitable punishment...

I don't think calling for retaliation is a good choice. Calling for caution and good judgment on the part of cyclists AND pedestrians would help a lot more. Not to mention motorists, of course.

sparker
sparker  
11/12/2013 10:39:59 AM
User Rank Village Voice
Re: Odd Stats
Cyclists killed two pedestrians in San Francisco last year and got off with wrist slaps (community service). Cyclists are Teflon, can't do anything wrong. We need a pedestrian militia. Some retaliation would soon make a dent in these statistics.

NewDream
NewDream  
11/1/2013 3:24:17 PM
User Rank Urban Legend
Re: Odd Stats
Terry Sweeney, I too wonder about the classification of bicycles. A bicycle is my primary transportation, and I know exactly what you mean about being a frightened cyclist...

NewDream
NewDream  
11/1/2013 3:13:16 PM
User Rank Urban Legend
Re: Odd Stats
@mejiac, stats are as accurate as the data that goes into them, usually. And they can be manipulated by including or excluding criteria from the analysis of the data.

I'd want a lot more information before I'd call these 'accurate' in any real sense. Do they accurately define the distribution within the model that was used? I'm sure they do. Does the model include the necessary classifications to properly visualize what is happening? My gut feel is that it does not.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
research
Smart City Money Makers
companies and solutions that are most prominent, and destined to be most profitable, in the smart city revolution.
How to Make Your City Smarter
Cities all over the world need to become smarter and more sustainable. But where to start? Download this guide to learn the first, proven steps toward making your city smarter.
all research
quick poll
Join the discussion
All polls
twitter feed
Future Cities Twitter Feed
follow us on facebook
Site Moderators
Future Cities is looking for engaged readers to moderate the message boards on this site. Engage in high-IQ conversations; earn kudos and perks. Interested? E-mail:
moderators@ubmfuturecities.com
directory
Designed to provide the people with access to green building products all year round
connect to us
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2014 UBM,
All rights reserved.